Times watch - The NY Times botches an op/ed piece and makes this startling admission: “Many saw an anti-Bush bias in the added language.” No!
1 comment:
Anonymous
said...
Was it anti-Bush language or a lie? It seems to me that what was altered was a quote. If I insert language into some text, you could state it was bias, but inserting words into a quote, isn't that flat out lying and not just bias?
1 comment:
Was it anti-Bush language or a lie? It seems to me that what was altered was a quote. If I insert language into some text, you could state it was bias, but inserting words into a quote, isn't that flat out lying and not just bias?
Post a Comment