Sunday, July 17, 2005

Times watch - The NY Times botches an op/ed piece and makes this startling admission: “Many saw an anti-Bush bias in the added language.” No!

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Was it anti-Bush language or a lie? It seems to me that what was altered was a quote. If I insert language into some text, you could state it was bias, but inserting words into a quote, isn't that flat out lying and not just bias?