Viking Pundit |
|
|
The only conservative in Western Massachusetts -
Email Eric Lindholm: ealindholm -at- msn -dot- com
Archives
Link ![]() Home Arts and Letters American Mind Ace of Spades HQ Althouse Anchoress Astute Blog Axis of Right Tim Blair Balloon Juice Betsy's Page Blue Crab Blvd Boots and Sabers Brainster The Corner Conserv Grapevine Contentions Country Store Election Projection Expat Yank Fark Flopping Aces Fox News Gateway Pundit Gay Patriot Hedgehog Report Hugh Hewitt Hit and Run Hot Air Hoystory Informed Speculation Instapundit Jawa Report Jaws Blog Little Green Footballs Maggie's Farm Mass Backwards Macs Mind Greg Mankiw Marginal Revolution Megan Mcardle Michelle Malkin Memeorandum MinuteMan Mises Economics Moderate Voice NE Republican Outside the Beltway Pajamas Media Patterico Political Wire PoliBlog Politico Poor & Stupid PoliPundit Political Junkie Power Line Protein Wisdom Q and O Radio Equalizer Rantburg Real Clear Politics RCP Blog Red State Right as Usual Right Wing News Rightwing Nuthouse Scrivener Sister Toldjah Stolen Thunder Stop the ACLU Strata-Sphere Don Surber Volokh Conspiracy VT Woodchuck Willisms Wizbang Winds of Change RSS Feed |
Tuesday, July 26, 2005
The Dems’ big idea: giving you something you already have Today, Fark linked to this Fox News story about the Democrats’ quest for conviction with this quip: “Democratic party to firmly be for something, as soon as the polls telling them what it is are completed.” So after months of bashing the Democrats for failing to take a position on Social Security reform, imagine my surprise when I caught this WashPost headline: “House Democrats to offer proposal for retirement savings.” Could it be true? Have the Democrats finally faced up to the unavoidable realization that Social Security – that cornerstone of the New Deal – must be reformed to survive? Are they (gasp!) acting responsibly on this issue, putting aside short-term political gain for the long-term fiscal security of the nation? Alas, no. You have to scan down to the very end of the story to figure out what the Democrats are proposing: An outline of the Democratic plan said it would "dramatically increase the number of people investing in 401(k) accounts by encouraging employers to automatically enroll eligible employees into 401(k) or other retirement plans unless the employee chooses not to participate." Thomas also favors requiring workers to opt out rather than opt in.Big whoop - this gives the word “token” a bad name. The Democrats are going to make employers do automatically what most people do voluntarily: sign up for a 401(k). (“Dramatically increase” my ass). This proposal does absolutely nothing to address Social Security’s looming insolvency. Its nefarious purpose, rather, is to offer a countermeasure to the Republicans’ personal account plan and provide a smidgen of political cover. You know, one blogger posts on the top of his page: "If your goal is to change minds and influence people, it's probably not a good idea to begin by asserting that virtually all elected Democrats are liars. But what the hell." Why not? The evidence keeps piling up.
Comments:
Can this possibly be the DNC entire idea:
Post a Comment
"An outline of the Democratic plan said it would "dramatically increase the number of people investing in 401(k) accounts by encouraging employers to automatically enroll eligible employees into 401(k) or other retirement plans unless the employee chooses not to participate." Thomas also favors requiring workers to opt out rather than opt in." An astonishingly liberal solution: coercion. I think that its stupid not to invest in a 401k but the answer shouldn't be to force everyone to do so. Its the Social Security mindset all over again Tobias |