Think about it: Harris has been the de facto nominee for almost a month, and Walz has been Harris’s running mate for nearly two weeks now. Neither one has done a single interview or press conference — no sit-down with 60 Minutes, no meeting with a newspaper editorial board, no Sunday shows. No interviews with local network television affiliates in swing states. Not even an on-the-record chat with Walz’s hometown papers or radio stations.
The difference between them and their opponents couldn’t be any more stark. And it’s long past time that the mainstream media started giving Harris and Walz a lot more grief about their shameless effort to avoid questioning between now and Election Day.
It's obvious why: Harris is a dimwit. Her interview with Lester Holt on the border was such a train wreck that she didn't have another sitdown interview for an entire year. She's only made a handful of utterances since becoming the de facto candidate and even those were inscrutable word salads.
I don't think she'll debate. It would definitively expose her as a fraud.
Extra - Gotta control the audience! "Patrons Furious After They All Got Tossed Out of Famous Restaurant to Have 'Staged' Event for Harris." It's all a show.
1 comment:
Dimwits are bad. Train wreck interviews are bad. Inscrutable word salads are bad. So VOTE TRUMP.
"I don't think she'll debate."
Man, you just can't vomit that one dumb rock out of your stomach, can you?
Ducking debates is bad. So VOTE TRUMP.
Post a Comment