Here's Jeff Jacoby with "Doubting Doomsday" in today's Boston Globe:
[MIT professor Richard] Lindzen is not the only climate expert to express skepticism about global-warming doomsaying -- not by a long shot. But so pervasive is the alarmist narrative that anyone who dissents from it can expect to be smeared as a shill for polluters or compared to a Holocaust denier. So perhaps Newsweek was just trying to do Lindzen a favor when it ran this credit line following his piece: "Lindzen is the Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Meteorology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. His research has always been funded exclusively by the US government. He receives no funding from any energy companies."Exactly the point I made a couple days ago.
The implication is about as subtle as a two-by-four. Apparently Lindzen's scientific and professional credentials aren't enough to lend authority to his views; readers must be explicitly reassured that "energy companies" haven't paid him off.
1 comment:
Yeah, and who could ever be suspicious of data manipulation, during an administration that sent out fake pro-WH news packages to local TV stations, and which rewrites scientific position papers to placate their base?
Post a Comment