Thursday, November 09, 2006

The verdict on Rumsfeld

Here’s Victor Davis Hanson writing on Pajamas Media:

Here is the record of Donald Rumsfeld. (1) Tried to take a top-heavy Pentagon and prepare it for the wars of the postmodern world, in which on a minute’s notice thousands of American soldiers, with air and sea support, would have to be sent to some god-awful place to fight some savagery—and then be trashed live on CNN for doing it; (2) less than a month after 9/11 he organized the retaliation against al Qaeda in the heart of primordial Afghanistan that removed the Taliban in 7 weeks, when we were all warned that the U.S., like the British and Russians of old, would fail; (3) oversaw the removal of Saddam in 3 weeks—after the 1991 Gulf War and the 12-years of 350,000 sorties in the no-fly-zones, and various bombing strikes, had failed. (4) Ah, you say, then there is the disastrous 3-year insurgency—too few troops, Iraqi army let go, underestimated “dead-enders” etc.?

But Rumsfeld knew that in a counterinsurgency (cf. Vietnam 1965-71) massive deployments only ensure complacency, breed dependency, and create resentment, and that, in contrast, training indigenous forces, ensuring political autonomy, and providing air and commando support (e.g., Vietnam circa 1972-4) is the only answer—although that is a long process that can work only if political support at home allows the military to finish the job (cf. the turn-of-the-century Philippines, and the British in Malaysia). He was a good man, and we were lucky to have him in our hour of need.
This may be the most laudatory thing written about Rumsfeld today, as the prevailing opinion is decidedly negative:

Boston Globe editorial: “President Bush should have asked for Donald Rumsfeld's resignation a long time ago. Rumsfeld bears much of the responsibility for a costly and dangerous sequence of blunders in Iraq.
And Slate with “A Catalog of Failure”: “It remains unclear whether Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld finally stepped down because he mismanaged the war on terrorism, failed in his efforts to transform the Pentagon, or became the scapegoat for the Republicans' loss of the House.”

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

I liked Rummy, but he did have a little of the MacNamara about him.

We do need more rapid deployment forces unless we want to hoard all our armored Brigades for 30 yrs. to fight a land war with the Chinese. ( at that point it will be nukes all the way )