Viking Pundit |
|
|
The only conservative in Western Massachusetts -
Email Eric Lindholm: ealindholm -at- msn -dot- com
Archives
Link ![]() Home Arts and Letters American Mind Ace of Spades HQ Althouse Anchoress Atlantic Crossings Axis of Right Tim Blair Balloon Juice Betsy's Page Blue Crab Blvd Brainster Melissa Clouthier The Corner Conserv Grapevine Contentions Country Store Election Projection Fark Flopping Aces Fox News Freedom Phile Gateway Pundit Gay Patriot Hedgehog Report Hugh Hewitt Hit and Run Hot Air Hoystory Informed Speculation Instapundit Jawa Report Jaws Blog Legal Insurrection Maggie's Farm Mass Backwards Macs Mind Greg Mankiw Marginal Revolution Megan Mcardle Michelle Malkin Memeorandum MinuteMan Mises Economics NE Republican Pajamas Media Patterico Political Wire PoliBlog Politico Poor & Stupid PoliPundit Power Line Protein Wisdom Q and O Radio Equalizer Real Clear Politics RCP Blog Red State Right as Usual Right Wing News Rightwing Nuthouse Scrivener Sister Toldjah Stolen Thunder Stop the ACLU Strata-Sphere Don Surber Truth about Cars Volokh Conspiracy Willisms Wizbang Window Manager RSS Feed |
Sunday, September 23, 2007
What liberal media? Hello, New York Times, have you met the petard? The NY Times' ombudsman declares that the newspaper violated its own policies to publish MoveOn's attack ad on General David Patraeus: Did MoveOn.org get favored treatment from The Times? And was the ad outside the bounds of acceptable political discourse?The New York Times justifies their actions by mouthing about the "tough choices" they must make but these choices consistently find favor on one side of the political spectrum and not the other. Watch that stock hit a five-year low. Extra - More details from Althouse.
Comments:
But, but... The New York Times is owned by a corporation, and corporations are, by definition, conservative.
Apparently, Pinch wrestled with his conscious and won. Now a special procsecutor should be appointed to get to the bottom of his cover-up. What does Pinch know and when did this occur.
Too bad it wasn't an ad about how one-limbed war hero Max "Osama" Cleland was mushy on protecting America. That's a message the GOP doesn't get phony-outraged about.
Too bad Lefties are evidently too stupid to be moved by evidence. Max Cleland lost his election because he was obviously more concerned with having a unionized group providing security at airports than in protecting the US from potential terrorists aboard planes. That was his choice, he could have voted the other way without affecting the outcome at all.
He must have thought his veteran's experience would overcome that. He was wrong.
Too bad Righties are evidently too craven to truly support military heroism, except as a useful prop mallet with which to issue talking points and intimidate opponents.
Post a Comment
This video says it all about "obvious concern," and where it's lacking: http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/09/24/shuster-to-rep-blackburn-when-was-the-last-time-a-new-york-times-ad-ever-killed-somebody/ |