I'm not a lawyer so I'll accept this legal analysis that Sullivan is making up stuff out of whole cloth. Waiting for the Legal Insurrection analysis.
It goes on and on like this while avoiding the core issue at hand. Rule 48 and Fokker require him to dismiss the case. He can investigate it all he likes, that’s never going to change— Undercover Huber (@JohnWHuber) June 1, 2020
Strong chance of a writ of mandamus being issued for Flynn 2-1 after this hot garbage
/ENDS
1 comment:
Courtroom Update:
By all reports, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit didn't quite concur with the above legal assertions that Judge Sullivan's actions are "a dog's breakfast." Nor a "fishing expedition." Nor "hot garbage." The court's skepticism may be guided by the binding precedent of Breakfast v. Garbage (1958).
Rather, the circuit court's pointed questions suggested the contrary. That they found the Barr DoJ's actions and lame justifications to be monkey business, a dumpster fire, and a steaming cow pie.
Apologies for the technical legal terminology.
Post a Comment