A question – According to the American Spectator, the John Bolton nomination
may be in real trouble. Does President Bush
have to nominate somebody else? Could he leave the position open as a kind of protest against the United Nations? That might be an even better outcome. Karl Rove, you magnificient bastard!
1 comment:
Well I think we need someone there to veto the anti-Israel resolutions. You would be amazed how many resolutions have a 14-1 vote with the United States being the lone "no" vote (and therefore a veto) on resolutions that are openly hostile to Israel.
What President Bush should do is make a recess appointment of someone who the Democrats would consider "worse" than Bolton.
Post a Comment