Well, here we are 18 years later: "Military admits F-35 is impossible to use, expensive, and an utter failure."
I've mentioned that for a while I worked on a NASA program and got so disillusioned, so fast. NASA would send out these newsletters that talked about how they had contractors (i.e. supplying jobs) spread out over a bunch of states. ("It'd be a shame if you voted against those jobs, Congressperson"). Building the final product seemed to be an afterthought and the scheduled slipped and slipped and slipped. For the record, this was not the Space Launch System but I mention it because NASAWatch had the same thoughts:
This is my favorite, by far: "The editorial board complains that SLS is "years behind schedule." If it had bothered to look, it would have realized that every major launch vehicle developed by NASA and by private industry ends up running years behind schedule." So in other words, its OK for NASA to propose schedules and then let the companies walk all over them and stick out their hands to say 'more money please' since everyone overruns. Who needs schedules or budgets, right? It is just taxpayer money anyway.
The problem here is that these large government programs morph into job programs and then there's no political will to pull the plug.
2 comments:
These sorts of hit pieces have been around for literally generations, and not just in the aerospace industry. The full story of the Chevy Covair is a case in point. When the Israeli Air Force trades theirs in for something else, I will worry.
The money we threw away on the arts these past 18 years could have been spent to design and produce a superior windshield wiper for a plane that will never be used.
Post a Comment