How would the media react? Well, last week we saw that "tent cities" had magically transformed into "soft-sided facilities." But how could they spin the obvious cage-like properties of shipping containers used to detain these unaccompanied minors? Could they possibly reveal their complete hypocrisy by giving Sleepy Joe a pass?
Oh, they can, and they will. Twitchy: "To the rescue! WaPo firefighter rides in to set the record straight once and for all about Joe Biden’s ‘kids in cages’." Ackshually, they're "migrant facilities" don't ya know. Ace has a complete rundown of "before and after" posts here: "Gimme Shelter: Biden Now Putting Kids in Cages "Shelters," and the Media Is Gushing About It!" They're like super-fun clubhouses!
The new Paper of Record weighs in: "Compassionate Biden Moves Migrant Children From Cages Into Humane High-Security Metal Containment Cubes"
With so much room for activities. Why is media trust in the tank? Truly, it's a left-wing riddle wrapped up in a New York Times enigma, chased down the street by pitchforks.
Under Trump it was “kids in cages”...under Biden it’s a migrant facility for children 🤗🤗
— Rita Panahi (@RitaPanahi) February 23, 2021
Can’t imagine why trust in the media is at historic lows.
https://t.co/vW0rAJn7Mu
1 comment:
It says "Unaccompanied Minors" right there in the Hot Air headline, you goof.
"Children in cages," "children in cages because the racist Stephen Miller ordered that children and infants be separated from their families without policy, funding or concern to ever reunite them." It's the same thing!
Post a Comment