Too bad that this has no distinction in the eyes of the law, no matter how Clinton and the media try to spin it. Hot Air: "“Malicious intent” is not required to break the law in Hillary Clinton’s case."
At one point in this email saga, Hillary whined that there had to be markings since she's too dim to figure out what might be classified. There do not have to be markings - this is all a red herring.
Refresher - "@HillaryClinton Meet 18 U.S.C § 793". "The fact that Secretary Clinton’s camp claims the particular emails in question were not marked “classified” or “top secret” at the time (even though the IG states that the emails “were classified when they were sent and are classified now”) is irrelevant. “Gross negligence” is the standard."