Turns out the Clinton Foundation has a “Mad Men” era wage gap of its own: Male executives made 38 percent more than female executives. Yep, apparently, the Clinton family foundation exemplifies the things Democrats say they hate: the Foundation drastically short-changes the female help.Live by the narrative, die by the narrative.
...
This isn’t the first time Hillary Clinton has been exposed as an equal-pay hypocrite. In August, the Washington Free Beacon revealed that women on Clinton’s campaign staff make less than the men, and her Senate office staff also had a pay gap larger than the national average.
Extra - Patterico: "The annual nonsense on the pay gap and hypocrisy from the Clinton Foundation."
1 comment:
The continual and unbroken hypocrisy by the left on this issue never ceases to amaze me.
On the one hand, you'd think at least one liberal could be found whose attitude would be: "I'm going to set an example in my own little fiefdom here, so I can proudly point to myself as an example of how it can and should be done." That would make for a story that would be much hailed by the media, and it wouldn't come at all that much monetary cost.
On the other hand, there's the overriding principle of liberals in power to consider: "Rules for thee, but not for me."
It's pretty obvious which of those two forces is the more powerful.
Post a Comment