Observation: Did you notice that whenever there’s an overwhelming consensus in the blogosphere on a particular matter, there’s always somebody out there trying to buck the conventional wisdom and justify a contrary opinion, if only to be a devil’s advocate?

I’m yet to see anybody defend Kerry’s asinine “I voted for it, but against it” statement.

A coveted VP-mention for the first to find anybody (blogger, columnist, DU poster) explaining how Kerry’s waffle was – in actuality! – accurate or helpful to his campaign.