The headline is hardly the interesting part of the article. The author seems more upset that the military found drugs and seems to suggest that they should have done nothing and just left the drugs there instead of call in law enforcement. The author seems to have an asinine belief that the military and police should never interact. If the military had found dead bodies instead of cocaine, should they also have done nothing and just ignored them? If that happened, what is the likelihood that the author would have written an article about a military coverup because they didn’t call in law enforcement?
1 comment:
The headline is hardly the interesting part of the article. The author seems more upset that the military found drugs and seems to suggest that they should have done nothing and just left the drugs there instead of call in law enforcement. The author seems to have an asinine belief that the military and police should never interact. If the military had found dead bodies instead of cocaine, should they also have done nothing and just ignored them? If that happened, what is the likelihood that the author would have written an article about a military coverup because they didn’t call in law enforcement?
Post a Comment