tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4053585.post8180678801349044840..comments2024-03-26T17:44:07.430-04:00Comments on Viking Pundit: Not with a bang but a whimperErichttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15911276942829790135noreply@blogger.comBlogger10125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4053585.post-26502426699877900072016-07-29T20:32:17.851-04:002016-07-29T20:32:17.851-04:00Your sincere reasoning process above - "So wh...Your sincere reasoning process above - "So what?" - was the demolishiest demolishing ever. BIG win for you. I'm still reeling. Best of all, that newest victory towel will be perfect for wiping the orange ass tan off your soft, puckered lips. <br /><br />Tip: If you're determined to troll, try to at least be an <i>interesting</i> one.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4053585.post-15480377505025465172016-07-29T10:55:21.587-04:002016-07-29T10:55:21.587-04:00The reason you dropped the italicized portion cite...The reason you dropped the italicized portion cited is because you realized it was a fallacy that I had already demolished, towel-breath.<br /><br />Amen.Post Towel-Throw Infractionnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4053585.post-28322186082885373682016-07-28T11:36:54.217-04:002016-07-28T11:36:54.217-04:00Your house must look like a men's locker room,...Your house must look like a men's locker room, with all the towels you've gloriously collected.<br /><br />What entertains me this morning is that I'd initially added, but dropped the following:<br /><i>Best of all, you don't even honestly believe that a proposal, let alone an unused proposal, is worse than actual behavior. But there are imaginary online battles to pretend to winAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4053585.post-33265411514740722172016-07-28T09:31:06.675-04:002016-07-28T09:31:06.675-04:00It's been too long since your last good towel ...It's been too long since your last good towel throw. Thanks for a nice one.<br /><br />Just as a suggestion so you don't have to embarrass yourself unnecessarily in the future: You may want to consider staying out of threads where it's obvious you're not going to be able to argue yourself out of a paper bag. It's really just about the art of picking and choosing your spots.<br[Thwap!]noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4053585.post-89335182988226119522016-07-27T22:34:01.011-04:002016-07-27T22:34:01.011-04:00Wow. Who knew Trump's ass tasted so good?Wow. Who knew Trump's ass tasted so good?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4053585.post-26222880212180538062016-07-27T21:53:50.228-04:002016-07-27T21:53:50.228-04:00...the DNC guy...
I love it. "The DNC guy&qu...<i>...the DNC guy...</i><br /><br />I love it. "The DNC guy" just happened to be the CFO of the entire organization. Was his suggestion condemned by others at the top? Well, does getting a response of "AMEN" from the <i><b>CEO</b></i> of the entire organization sound like condemnation? Does the fact that the DNC guy subsequently denied that the email was even about Sanders Amen, and Amennoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4053585.post-44945194587806922452016-07-27T15:57:34.913-04:002016-07-27T15:57:34.913-04:00Yes, and it's more than different (or "di...Yes, and it's more than different (or "different"), it's worse. <br /><br />Actually doing it is different from proposing doing it. That concept's not to your taste, obviously.<br /><br />When the DNC guy proposed it, his idea went nowhere. After his suggestion was exposed and the DNC guy was widely condemned, he apologized. When Trump was widely condemned for doing it, Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4053585.post-60684704282552908862016-07-27T09:48:53.545-04:002016-07-27T09:48:53.545-04:00Um, a candidate questioning opponents' religio...<br />Um, a candidate questioning opponents' religion is sort of (how shall I say this?) "different" than a supposedly neutral intra-party organization doing so <i>within its own internal pool of candidates</i> in order to put its thumb on the scale for one of them.<br /><br /><br /><br />Anonymously unclear on the conceptnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4053585.post-86819077017947081222016-07-27T03:31:24.050-04:002016-07-27T03:31:24.050-04:00including contemplating making him elaborate on hi...<i>including contemplating making him elaborate on his religious beliefs</i><br /><br /><br />The sincerity of Republicans on this subject is touching, as they rally behind a man who didn't merely "sit around thinking," but has openly questioned Hillary Clinton's religion, Barack Obama's religion, Mitt Romney's religion, and Ted Cruz's religion. <br /><br />The &Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4053585.post-32271577124951800012016-07-26T22:57:42.830-04:002016-07-26T22:57:42.830-04:00Not that I doubt the result would have been differ...Not that I doubt the result would have been different had another fringe Democrat challenged Hillary, but Bernie Sanders isn't a Democrat, he's been an independent for the past 35 years. Why should the Democratic party support him in the same manner as a lifelong "true believer"? <br /><br />Lets not be hypocritical here. If the RNC emails were made public, you can be damn Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com