tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4053585.post4629099558532874776..comments2024-03-17T08:19:05.517-04:00Comments on Viking Pundit: This is so sweet, so very sweetErichttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15911276942829790135noreply@blogger.comBlogger10125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4053585.post-2571874661540307772017-08-18T01:00:09.786-04:002017-08-18T01:00:09.786-04:00http://www.politico.com/states/new-york/city-hall/...http://www.politico.com/states/new-york/city-hall/story/2017/08/16/times-editorials-editor-testifies-in-palin-defamation-lawsuit-113994<br /><br />http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/new-york-times-sarah-palin-editorial_us_5994bdf9e4b0d0d2cc840d3f<br /><br />https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/erik-wemple/wp/2017/08/17/Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4053585.post-87138150449028762752017-08-12T19:21:32.750-04:002017-08-12T19:21:32.750-04:00Dude, you just won again!Dude, you just won again!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4053585.post-75570919399163641782017-08-12T14:20:49.028-04:002017-08-12T14:20:49.028-04:00"Go back to their very sincere concerns about..."Go back to their very sincere concerns about tort reform?"Erichttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15911276942829790135noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4053585.post-8093344192976404392017-08-12T13:10:25.528-04:002017-08-12T13:10:25.528-04:00Why do you keep bringing up legal arguments? Do yo...<i>Why do you keep bringing up legal arguments? Do you really think Palin is suing to get her hands on $75,000? ... Legally the NY Times will win their case, just like OJ.</i><br /><br /><br />It'll be nice when this "hilarious" nuisance suit ends, so Republicans can go back to their very sincere concerns about tort reform.Justice Warren Nothingburgernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4053585.post-25802633941895113802017-08-12T08:01:52.267-04:002017-08-12T08:01:52.267-04:00Is that you Al Sharpton?
https://www.youtube.com/...Is that you Al Sharpton?<br /><br />https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9lhGY7kr41IErichttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15911276942829790135noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4053585.post-7443641150352780532017-08-12T02:35:02.701-04:002017-08-12T02:35:02.701-04:00"Dude, we already won. The testimony will be..."Dude, we already won. The testimony will be legendary and unforgettable. And liberals live inside a bubble."Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4053585.post-5188479864910509432017-08-11T20:49:28.701-04:002017-08-11T20:49:28.701-04:00The other day the NY Times touted their super-excl...The other day the NY Times touted their super-exclusive on a climate change memo: "We gotz the secret memo that Trump is trying to suppress!" until it was revealed that the thing has been out since January. Yet somehow they don't see a problem in the echo chamber and you seem to think bias is something we're imagining. The Palin editorial strikes a chord because everyone Erichttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15911276942829790135noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4053585.post-65132370058911543682017-08-11T19:24:19.158-04:002017-08-11T19:24:19.158-04:00Read the link. The judge is specifically addressi...Read the link. The judge is specifically addressing the merit of Sarah Palin's argument that the editorial was malicious because it was contradicted by other NY Times material. Look at his language: "...inferences favorable to the plaintiff," "...the circumstances alleged in the Complaint." <br /><br />Palin's big problem is that the 9-0 <i>Sullivan v. New York Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4053585.post-33628274671763474002017-08-11T18:39:08.701-04:002017-08-11T18:39:08.701-04:00Oh, all right, the JUDGE wants the author of the e...Oh, all right, the JUDGE wants the author of the editorial to appear and explain why he/she didn't read the NY Times.<br /><br />Hilarity will ensue.<br /><br />https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3923032-document-18815602.htmlErichttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15911276942829790135noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4053585.post-59291378673232616052017-08-11T03:29:57.869-04:002017-08-11T03:29:57.869-04:00The coverage, including the above court filing lin...The coverage, including the above court filing link via Twitchy, indicates that the party raising the question is the judge in the case, not the Times. There is no claim of a comically "unreasonable" assumption coming from anyone.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com